1. 在2001年12月11日至13日的第四十二届会议上，理事会为有关的巴勒斯坦人制定了一项“迟交的索赔”方案(“迟交的索赔方案”)，这些索赔人能够证明他们没有充分有效的机会在1992年1月1日至1996年1月1日联合国赔偿委员会(“委员会”或“赔委会”)的个人索赔提交期(“正常提交期”)内向委员会提交索赔。
At its forty-second session held from 11 to 13 December 2001, the Governing Council established a “late claims” programme (the “late-claims programme”) for Palestinians who can establish that they did not have a full and effective opportunity to file claims with the United Nations Compensation Commission (the “Commission” or “UNCC”) during the Commission's filing period for individual claims, from 1 January 1992 to 1 January 1996 (the “regular filing period”).
2. 根据理事会的指示，由“D”类专员Michael Pryles(主席)、Kamal Hossain和Nayla Comair-Obeid组成了一个专员小组(“小组”)。
Pursuant to the direction of the Governing Council, a Panel of Commissioners (the “Panel”) consisting of Michael Pryles (Chairman), Kamal Hossain and Nayla Comair-Obeid, was constituted from among the category “D” Commissioners.
小组在理事会的指导下对每一件巴勒斯坦人“迟交的索赔”进行了最起码合格评估。
The Panel has conducted the threshold eligibility assessment directed by the Governing Council in respect of each Palestinian “late claim”.
这项评估要求小组确定索赔人是否证明他们没有充分有效的机会在正常提交期内提交索赔。
This assessment required the Panel to determine whether claimants establish that they did not have a full and effective opportunity to file claims during the regular filing period.
小组还审查了符合最起码合格要求的“C”类索赔的事实情况。
The Panel has also reviewed the merits of those category “C” claims that satisfied the threshold eligibility requirement.
符合最起码合格要求的“D”类索赔的事实情况正另外由“D2”专员小组(“D2”小组)审查。
The category “D” claims that have satisfied the threshold eligibility requirement are being reviewed on their merits separately by the “D2” Panel of Commissioners (the “D2” Panel).
3. 这是小组根据委员会《索赔程序暂行规则》(S/AC.26/1992/10)(“规则”)第38条(e)款提交理事会的第四份也是最后一份报告。
This is the fourth and final report of the Panel submitted to the Governing Council pursuant to article 38(e) of the Commission's Provisional Rules for Claims Procedure (S/AC.26/1992/10) (the “Rules”).
4. 本报告载有小组就19,364件“C”类索赔和38件“D”类索赔是否有资格纳入迟交的索赔方案提出的确定意见1 。
This report contains the Panel's determinations as to eligibility for inclusion in the late-claims programme of [xxxx]19, category “C” and [xxxx]38 category “D” claims.
本报告还载有小组关于4,724件“C”类索赔(“第四批索赔”)的建议。
It also includes the Panel's recommendations on the merits of [xxxx]4,24 category “C” claims (the “fourth instalment claims”).
5. 在2004年6月29日至7月2日的第五十二届会议上，理事会审议了巴勒斯坦权力机构关于允许其就95件索赔提交替代索赔的请求，这95件索赔因丢失或在运送途中遗失，委员会在巴勒斯坦人“迟交的索赔”提交期内未能收到。
At its fifty-second session held from 29 June to 2 July 2004, the Governing Council considered the request of the Palestinian Authority to file replacement claims in respect of 95 claims that were misplaced or lost in transit and were not received by the Commission during the filing period for Palestinian “late claims”.
2 应巴勒斯坦权力机构的请求，理事会请小组逐案确定是否应在迟交的索赔方案中接受提交这些索赔。
In responding to the request of the Palestinian Authority, the Governing Council requested the Panel to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether these claims should be accepted for filing in the late-claims programme.
在最初提及的95件索赔中，巴勒斯坦权力机构提交了78件。
The Palestinian Authority submitted 78 claims out of the 95 initially stated.
小组对这些索赔进行了审查，接受提交41件“C”类和5件“D”类索赔。
The Panel has reviewed these claims and has accepted 41 category “C” and five category “D” claims for filing.
这些索赔已列入本报告。
These claims are included in this report.
6. 小组在本报告中完成全部45,971件巴勒斯坦人“迟交的索赔”的资格评估，3 包括43,597件“C”类和2,374件“D”类索赔，4 并且完成全部7,797件符合资格的“C”类索赔事实情况的审查。
With this report, the Panel completes the eligibility assessment of all 46,[xxx]45,71 Palestinian “late claims”, comprised of 43,[xxx]43,7 category “C” and 2,[xxx]2,4 category “D” claims, and its review on the merits of a total of 7,[xxx]7,797 eligible category “C” claims.
7. 本报告叙述小组就第四批巴勒斯坦人“迟交的索赔”进行的审查工作。
This report covers the claims reviewed and work performed by the Panel in connection with the fourth instalment claims.
小组于2004年8月4日、10月6日、12月13日至14日举行了会议，并经常在成员之间以及与秘书处交换意见。
The Panel met on 4 August, 6 October and 13-14 December 2004, and also regularly conferred among themselves and with the secretariat.
8. 执行秘书根据《规则》第16条向理事会提交了日期分别为2002年10月17日、2003年4月17日、2003年10月6日以及2004年1月19日的第41、43、45和46号报告，载有关于巴勒斯坦权力机构提交的索赔类别、索赔件数以及每类的索赔总额的统计数字。
In accordance with article 16 of the Rules, the Executive Secretary submitted to the Governing Council report Nos. 41, 43, 45 and 46 dated 17 October 2002, 17 April 2003, 6 October 2003 and 19 January 2004, respectively, with statistics concerning the categories of claims submitted by the Palestinian Authority in respect of the number of claims and the total claimed amount in each category.
这些第16条报告主要涉及第四批的所有索赔。
These article 16 reports covered most of the claims in the fourth instalment.
报告已发给包括巴勒斯坦权力机构在内的所有索赔政府和提交实体以及伊拉克共和国政府(“伊拉克”)。
The reports were distributed to all claimant Governments and submitting entities, including the Palestinian Authority, as well as the Government of the Republic of Iraq (“Iraq”).
关于余下的几件索赔的统计数字将列入计划于2005年3月发表的下一份第16条报告。
The statistics relating to the few remaining claims will be included in the next article 16 report, scheduled for March 2005.
9. 小组在审查索赔并提出确定意见和建议时采用了有关的安全理事会决议、赔委会理事会决定、《规则》和其他有关的国际法原则。
In undertaking its review of the claims and in making its determinations and recommendations, the Panel has applied relevant Security Council resolutions, Governing Council decisions, the Rules, and other relevant principles of international law.
小组针对索赔进行了上文第2段所述最起码合格评估，并按照《就第一批巴勒斯坦人“迟交的索赔”提出的报告和建议》6 、《就第二批巴勒斯坦人“迟交的索赔”提出的报告和建议》7 《就第三批巴勒斯坦人“迟交的索赔”提交的报告和建议》8 中所述的原则和方法审查了本批中的“C”类索赔。
The Panel has conducted the threshold eligibility assessment of the claims referred to in paragraph above and has reviewed the category “C” claims in this instalment in accordance with the principles and methodologies that were described in its report and recommendations concerning the first instalment of Palestinian “late claims”, its report and recommendations concerning the second instalment of Palestinian “late claims” and its report and recommendations concerning the third instalment of Palestinian “late claims”.
10. 小组为进行理事会指示的最起码合格评估制定了分为两个步骤的办法。
The Panel developed a two-step process for conducting the threshold eligibility assessment directed by the Governing Council.